It’s for children and manchildren.

The humans in my family who experience menstrual cycles

lol

You must be living in a bubble if you truly believe that.

not forced behavior for end users.

This is what I’m constantly criticizing. It’s fine to have more options, but they should be options and not mandatory.

No, having to scroll past an AI summary for every fucking article is not an ‘option.’ Having the option to hide it forever (or even better, opt-in), now that’s a real option.

I’d really love to see the opt-in/opt-out data for AI. I guarantee businesses aren’t including the option or recording data because they know it will show people don’t want it, and they have to follow the data!

Good. I don’t really care about youtube, but less censorship is always a good thing.

How can you people say you respect science when you support silencing any criticism of it? That’s not science. That’s religion.

That said, this criteria clearly only exists to protect “influencers” who make youtube a proportional amount of money. If you have a channel with very little traffic and you say something controversial, you’d better believe your “freedom of expression value” will not be high enough to outweigh the corporation’s perceived “harm risk.”

So you’re saying copyright and patent laws only exist to help rich people?

I guess that would make all of the workers defending them ‘useful idiots’ then.

They got that money because of strong enforcement of copyright protections.

Without copyright laws, everyone could’ve just shared Disney’s shit without fear of repercussion and they would have billions less while we collectively have billions more.

I dunno, we’ve seen corporations come at each other many times before.

Most of you people won’t understand this, but copyright and patent laws aren’t going to be around forever. They don’t help the working class and it’s only a matter of time before new generations rise above our tunnel vision and indoctrination.

I mean, just look at this case a prime example. Who is the one suing? Disney. Who stands to benefit? Disney.

Are the random joe’s suing? No, they can’t afford it. The laws do not exist to protect them. It’s another reason why we never see big corporations challenge copyright and patent laws. They know they make more money with them.

Putting periods in acronyms is some 90s shit.

You only need 1 case, but screen protectors can crack if you can believe that.

I completely agree.

I see no reason to take their criticisms seriously. Have you ever seen a chinese website?

Only if you’re a scumbag/useful idiot.

Such a terrible idea unless it’s free software.

Advertising should be illegal.

The world would be a better place without it.

It’s a shame. AI has potential but most people just want to exploit its development for their own gain.

It depends on the human.

I’d wager children would lose quite often.

It plays okay for a few moves but then the moment it gets in trouble it straight up cheats.

Lol. More comparisons to how AI is currently like a young child.

More free software is always a good thing.

There are other cryptocurrencies without the overhead of bitcoin. Bitcoin is actually a really shitty implementation in regards to efficiency.

Cryptocurrency as a concept is incredibly useful and as time goes on it will likely be how most business is done.

Governments just aren’t as good at regulating currency as computers. Look at inflation on the US dollar.

https://riseup.net/en/vpn