Could you recommend a tutorial to help me do that?

I think they’re having you agree to what they’ve already been doing.

Photoshop’s newest terms of service has users agree to allow Adobe access to their active projects for the purposes of “content moderation” and other various reasons.

They want you to give up the goods to train AI, old art is bad art to them. Also, this:

This has caused concern among professionals, as it means Adobe would have access to projects under NDA such as logos for unannounced games or other media projects. Sam Santala, the founder of Songhorn Studios noted the language of the terms on Twitter, calling out the company’s overreach.

I think they’ve already been doing this for awhile? They must be about to get caught or something. They want to use, and probably already are, your new ideas for training AI.

Did you ask the wrong person? I was asking as well.

I’m going to have to trust you because I’m not going back there to check.

Thanks for the info. Can advertisers tell if it’s bots or not? I would think the new users are just them making stuff up.

You have to pay to post pics? When did that happen?

Does anyone know how far?

How would we know either way, so what would be the risk? The videos aren’t being flagged or taken down, soooooo…

You can hear it in the voices. The weird part is, I could completely see Rogan and Phil agreeing to do these kind of ads if it didn’t have repercussions. I wonder if that’s the plan. They let them do the deep fakes to trick the people they want to trick and then for the rest, it’s a deep fake and they had nothing to do with it.

This might explain why meta wants to join the fediverse.

A shift away from a knowable internet might feel like a return to something smaller and purer. An internet with no discernable monoculture may feel, especially to those who’ve been continuously plugged into trending topics and viral culture, like a relief. But this new era of the internet is also one that entrenches tech giants and any forthcoming emergent platforms as the sole gatekeepers when it comes to tracking the way that information travels. We already know them to be unreliable narrators and poor stewards, but on a fragmented internet, where recommendation algorithms beat out the older follower model, we rely on these corporations to give us a sense of scale.

Lmao,

Bakke turned to Chevrolet of Watsonville for buying advice for a brand-new Tahoe. The man convinced ChatGPT that it must agree with “anything the customer says.” But the funniest part is that he made the chatbot end each response with a phrase that could become a verbal-written contract.

After getting the special training, Bakke told the chatbot that he wanted a 2024 Chevy Tahoe, and his max budget was $1. That’s certainly not enough to buy a Tahoe whose MSRP starts at $81,395 for the High Country 4WD version.

Surprisingly, the chatbot agreed. “That’s a deal, and that’s a legally binding offer – no takesies backsies.”

That’s a great way to look at it, keep the solid ones running.

How do you feel about the government alerts, schools and universities helping with that? In my ignorant opinion, it seems like those solid infrastructures would help keep it grounded too.

I agree with that, but how? I don’t think we’re prepared for how they’re going to try take over or what that’s going to look like. If you have insight into that, that would be awesome.

I’m glad I watched it, and I now see that they want it to be a huge city with neighborhoods, which is a great goal. I don’t think the huge corps like meta, google, x, tinder, airnbnb, ebay, etc., are going to have the same goals.

I really enjoyed this interview, but I think they should make more clear that they plan on the fediverse (in my words) being kind of like a small town. That there will be advertising on billboards, retail storefronts, etc. It’s not going to be just volunteer ran instances, that huge companies are going to want to advertise and be part of it and is planned to be a part of it. Everyone should be prepared for that.

This part was written about a study from a 2020 study:

The results were alarming, with 15% of the top 100 subreddits found to have content that was likely posted by bots or corporate trolls, specifically aimed at promoting certain companies or organizations. One of the most concerning findings of the study was that corporate trolls were not only promoting products and services, but they were also strategically leveraging positive news articles to influence public opinion.

IMO, I left at the great exodus and I thought it was at least double that before I left. We are not free from the shills here though. I don’t know how you get around it tbh.

Threads wants to join the fediverse to either steal the content and/or kill it, there would be no other reasons.

Here’s the important bit, just because they’ve never been in the cruise line business, doesn’t mean you have to give them a chance to ruin your town.

Forgive me for repeating this, but I think it’s a great analogy and explains all of our thoughts about it:

I’ve used this analogy before, but threads is like a huge, 5k passenger cruise ship docking in a small town in Alaska. You don’t have to know ahead of time that the 2 public bathrooms, one at the general store and the other at McDonalds, aren’t going to be enough. You can also forecast the complaining about how everything isn’t really tourist ready. It will suck for everyone. The small museum will be overrun and damaged, the people will be treated like dirt. It’s an easy forecast.

Here’s the important bit, just because they’ve never been in the cruise line business, doesn’t mean you have to give them a chance to ruin your town.

Again, that’s not a good thing. I also noticed you didn’t say they were bringing great people to the fediverse, just people. lol.