using an LLM doesn’t take money from artists

copyright is immoral

they might claim they’re harmed if the information is distributed for free. I don’t care. that’s not theft.

since the defendant is also a capitalist firm, I can see the similarities, but if someone were to simply be liberating the information, I don’t see that as stealing.

stealing others’ work

Reuters still has their analysis. nothing was stolen.

Whether you support IP or not, the AI company is clearly in the wrong here.

they’re both wrong to restrict access. if legal analysis is necessary to understand the law, then restricting access to that analysis, or it’s free dissemination, is also wrong.

I don’t trust that judge’s ability to determine whether they were copied if it wasn’t verbatim. which is what copyright is. to control an idea, you need a patent.

tragic. no one should need to pay to read the law

right. I just thought they’d made the news today or something.

what did PayPal do?

I keep all the little snippets like that in an org-mode file, and write notes about what I was doing and why, and org-babel can even execute the code right there in the document.

and it’s not even running a terminal!!

what’s netbird

glad my root pass is toor and not something as obvious as password123

everything is political. you are advocating that these institutions pretend observer bias doesn’t exist.

android

oooh. now do economics!!