Oh, the headless version of the game makes much more sense than a headless link.
But if you launch a headless program underneath your particular user, with which you’re then going to log off, then it will close regardless
Nohup is your friend.
Oh, the headless version of the game makes much more sense than a headless link.
But if you launch a headless program underneath your particular user, with which you’re then going to log off, then it will close regardless
Nohup is your friend.
You say some software is “headless” if you can launch it, log-off your computer and it keeps running.
I imagine it’s a link suitable to use with c-url, but I never even noticed it’s there.
Did you hear about it when that same software had that same problem on its Linux endpoint system a couple of months ago?
Well, me neither. I can’t tell how much of if is “anybody willing to use something like that will also want a Windows server” (crazy people), or “nobody that wants Linux would accept it”. Those two are not exactly the same, and I don’t know how well the auditors that keep pushing this kind of shit into companies interact with the culture.
You mean like NixOS?
It wouldn’t technically stop anything, it would just make your live Hell on Earth if you tried to add that self-updating ring-0 proprietary software in your servers.
But I guess what you are looking for is immutable infrastructure? That one would stop the problem.
Yep.
But there also exists Endpoint Detection and Prevention System, Intrusion Prevention System, Enterprise Security system, Network Threat Detection, Network Threat Prevention… And all those things name the exact same products (or at least, products you buy bundled on the same package).
Somehow I managed to use the one acronym that is wrong.
It’s an oops.
It should be IDS.
It’s only marginal for running custom code. Every large organization has at least a few of them running important out-of-the-box services.
It is on the sense that Windows admins are the ones that like to buy this kind of shit and use it. It’s not on the sense that Windows was broken somehow.
Well, “don’t have self-upgrading shit on your production environment” also applies.
As in “if you brought something like this, there’s a problem with you”.
Remember guys, it took about a decade for Solar Winds to discover somebody had root access to everybody that used their software, another decade for somebody outside Solar Winds to discover it and tell everybody, and half a decade with nobody claiming to have solved the issue up to now.
So when you believe that your computer with an EDS is safe just because you can’t use it, think again.
It has been in exponential growth since the signal was distinguishable from the noise, and exponentials do not have inflection points…
The only inflection we can expect is when it reaches 1/4 of saturation.
Tony Lazuto says you should delete System32
Yep, different licenses have different consequences.
The same way, if the BSD internet stack was GPL, we wouldn’t have an internet at all.
That’s yet another great joke that GNU ruined.
Oh, they absolutely should. A “Jarvis” would be great.
But that thing they are pushing has absolutely no relation to a “Jarvis”.
Well, ok. I don’t really plan to do that. It was a joke.
I do wish it was something viable, though.
That’s why I plan to move my servers into an L4 clone.
It’s close to 1 in 20 PCs nowadays. It’s growing very quickly, and has been adopted in non-irrelevant amounts for a few years already.
It is necessarily so. You can’t configure an immutable distro by a sequence of mutations.
But yes, the other way around is quite possible.