Yeah, I’m guessing there are many reasons that they don’t disclose that.
Yeah, I’m guessing there are many reasons that they don’t disclose that.
Yeah, at least the ones I used have some kind of console/terminal you can use and often you can access BIOS and reinstall the OS if you want.
At least when it comes to games, they likely don’t want to disclose to potential cheaters how they detected them.
It’s also a support burden to look into every case of automated bans.
Screenshots here: https://www.windowslatest.com/2024/09/12/windows-10s-start-menu-design-is-changing-to-make-room-for-microsoft-365/
TL:DR: There is barely any difference at all. They added some account manager, but in general the start menu looks how it looked before.
Well, I at least chuckled.
Remember the people that cry that copyright is an invention of the devil and how it should be more open*
*Doesn’t apply to AI of course.
I’m sorry you feel that way about fish Linux
I also dislike DRM but I don’t think it makes any sense to make it illegal.
Ireland really seems corrupt as fuck when it comes to Facebook, Apple and I think Google.
Yeah, same situation when the Irish DPA refuses to fine Facebook for violating the GDPR so the EU has to step in and force them to fine Facebook and thus collect all the money.
Nah, I doubt it. The app developers are freely adding this themselves.
You’re referring to the PPA repo thing, yeah?
No they actually have a real apt repo now.
The union would be extremely powerful with just one robot though. There would be no competition or different opinions. If the single robot strikes to get better working conditions or better pay, the entire workforce is on strike.
This is the individual app’s fault and not Googles. It’s like getting mad at Steam for allowing apps with DRM. Is feature is entirely optional and requires extra effort to implement.
Also didn’t Google already get sued in the USA for Android not being open enough or something like that.
And even fucking iPhone 16!
(But doesn’t pretty much all non apple flagships support minimum 3.0?
Many cheaper smartphones have 2.0 USB C
Yes, but how is it malicious to comply with the license? If the license doesn’t require the code to be usable without a backend they have fully complied. Does the license even require usable code at all?
As long as they give the source code they are required to give I don’t see any problem with it.
Depending on what OP actually wants to do it might be simpler to just install Linux normally in a VM. I recommend Hyper-v if you are using Windows Pro and if you are using Windows Home I recommend upgrading to Pro using MAS scripts or using a workaround to install Hyper-V on Home.
You could also use a hypervisor like virtualbox but they are type 2 hypervisors which are usually slower compared to type 1 like Hyper-v or KVM.
You said it was malicious though.
50% more monthly is a lot more though.