Well, if that’s how it worked before, they must’ve changed it. I installed it last night without paying and it never blocked me.
Well, if that’s how it worked before, they must’ve changed it. I installed it last night without paying and it never blocked me.
Are you talking about DeArrow? The website gives you the option to pay or just download without paying.
Yep. It’s part of their mating ritual. You can learn more about it at c/fuckcars.
I have no qualms about AI being used in products. But when you have to tell me that something is “powered by AI” as if that’s your main selling point, then you do not have a good product. Tell me what it does, not how it does it.
Oh, so you mean local vs external, not browser-based vs other local solutions.
What makes the built-in database easier to attack than a separate one?
Microsoft is working very hard at getting into this data game. Don’t think they won’t try making similar deals.
Are we looking at a future where we need a search engine to tell us which search engine to use for your queries?
This is a problem with the add-on store, not the browser. Do the forks have their own add-on stores? Or do they just use the same one that Mozilla provides? To the best of my knowledge, the only forks that have their own stores are the ones that wouldn’t be able to use Firefox plugins anyway (e.g. Palemoon).
I don’t think forking Firefox is going to change what you see in the add-on store. You would need someone to run their own store. Or just install the plugin manually.
I’d be surprised if being born with a specific face configuration isn’t protected in the same way that race and gender are.
Somehow, we manage to accept organ transplants despite it hurting one healthy person a little to help an unhealthy person a lot. What’s stopping us from treating birth control the same way?
You might benefit from installing earlyoom. It’ll kill some of your processes before the system freezes from running out of memory.
It is made by scientists. And we don’t know how to make the model determine whether or not it knows something. So far, we only have tools that tell us that something probably wasn’t in the training set (e.g. using variance across models in a mixture of experts setup), but that doesn’t tell us anything about how correct it is.
I’ve heard Elon Musk (or was it Karpathy?) talking about how camera should be sufficient for all scenarios because humans can do it on vision alone, but that’s poor reasoning IMO. Cars are not humans, so there’s no reason to confine them to the same limitations. If we want them to be safer and more capable than human drivers, one way to do that is by providing them with more information.
Oh, I see. You’re clarifying why jonne thought this was the case, not arguing for why they’re correct.
The article is about Google. Why does it matter that it’s missing from the Alphabet handbook?
I think a part of it is the difference to losing to something “reasonable” vs “unreasonable.”
Yeah, that’s understandable. I just don’t think there’s an equivalent in LoL that would feel particularly unfair. At worst, someone just knows where you are at all times. What do you do with that information? That requires good game knowledge. You can only influence a small portion of the map yourself and teammates tend to like acting independently even if you provide them with extra info.
Smurfing is a bigger problem, but I’ve found that Riot tends to be very good at gauging your skill level even if you intentionally sandbag. LoL is just one of those game where it’s really hard to convincingly pretend to be bad at it.
I’ve never actually noticed cheaters during the time I played the game. If they cheat and matchmaking puts me against them, it just means that me without cheats and them with cheats are equivalent in skill level, so it’s a fair and fun game. So I don’t see the point in preventing cheats in the first place unless you’re at the very top of the ladder, and there’s so few people up there that it should be easy to just manually ban the cheaters.
Much faster to skim the contents of an article than a video.