It literally says cargo ship
It literally says cargo ship
If your comment requires /s, maybe just don’t post it in the first place.
Tariffs change. Especially when Trump or another nutcase is in office.
Our thoughts?
Most providers in the US allow it too. It’s great that Germany has it enshrined in law, but in practice it’s not the exception.
Sort of. I feel like I report half the posts around here because they’re neither news nor articles.
Too late, I already did.
I’ve used Lawnchair for years and had no issues either. Is there some widespread problem I’ve been lucky enough to avoid?
Maybe we shouldn’t be treating text generators as sources of truth.
Isn’t there some liability for someone who provides inaccurate voting information? Perhaps that could be used to influence Google et al. to stop providing AI summaries on their results pages.
Itself, not very, but any dust or flakes that land on it definitely will be. It only takes very small particles.
Usually, equipment like that is abandoned in place. Radiation has weakened its parts, and decontamination is complex and time-consuming for something you can’t just hose and scrub down.
For the stock launcher, yeah. Alternatives are a dime a dozen.
I’m almost certainly not going to watch one, but I’m not going to suggest they’re banned, unless something changes and the majority of content becomes videos for some reason. I haven’t felt that it’s a problem.
I’d rather see posts of tech support or someone’s shower thoughts be removed, because I see that pretty frequently, and it pushes the relevant content down. At least it’s not 80% tangentially-related business news or “Musk tweeted something” any more.
I don’t think this is something to focus on. Tech being 40% of all emissions in the US is suspicious, given that in 2021, all industry was 30.1%, and all transportation was 28.5%. And the total emissions in the US was 6.3 billion tons. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=108623
I don’t have more recent data (if it’s in the article, I didn’t see it at a skim) but I feel like oil, gas, and agriculture are the bigger long-term targets.
In that sense, yes, they are always listening. But that’s a very small system that only compares like the last two seconds of audio against the stored model of the user saying “Alexa”.
Even a tweet from a security professional with a screenshot of Wireshark would be nice for a start.
There’s nothing new, news sites are just rerunning the same story because it gets clicks.
There is a save function, you know.
tl;dr: no. The article shits all over the question. Newsweek is still trash.
It’s not about whether they can, it’s about whether they will.
Spoiler: they won’t.