An engineer should be at the helm. MBAs fuck tech companies up.
An engineer should be at the helm. MBAs fuck tech companies up.
Leaving a plague of abandonment trauma in his wake.
That rear sensor worked flawlessly.
Why? Seems to work well most of the time for me.
A clsssic!
Why do I suddenly feel a meme coming on? 😅
Most of the UI changes they make, make things worse.
You just engaged.
Laying people off is a way to juice the stock price in the short term. So perhaps the “economy is booming” because of the layoffs?
I haven’t met gates and I agree these days he comes across pleasantly, but perhaps you are not old enough to remember stories of what he was like in his 30s and 40s when Microsoft was younger. He was a tyrant and viscously anticompetitive. As a husband my understanding is that he cheated on his wife (not uncommon I know but still hurtful). He might have become a somewhat better person, maybe, but he certainly wasn’t one when he was making his fortune.
Sorry!
The first time I opened vim (it was probably just vi at the time) I couldn’t exit it and had to shut down the computer by holding down the power button (!) to regain control of the machine. It took a while before I tried it again. Ultimately nano felt like it was for kids and emacs felt like an even worse option than vi so I memorized a few sequences, eg :q!, :wq, how to enter the insert mode and how to exit it and simple edit commands like dd and x and this gave me enough proficiency to get by.
Most all the terminal commands require prior study before they become easy to use. Its because Unix was created by engineers rather than by ui/ux design professionals.
My speculation is that they paid Sutskever a lot of money to go away and keep his mouth shut
Exactly. They exist to give legal cover so that the risk of wrongful termination lawsuits is minimized for the employer
Yes it is unfortunately common. The family members align in their identification of the scapegoat and their cohesion influences the involved therapists who do not realize the larger picture. The victims are themselves both traumatized and also inculcated family members so it is fairly common that the scapegoats do not realize how fucked up things are until they’re older. Incest families are often highly invested in a family ideal that both hides the ugliness and also enables it to flourish (because our golden boy would never do anything like that!). When the scapegoat finally figures it out and tries to tell the truth they are shut down by the defenders of the family ideal. It is easier to shun the truth teller than to accept that the family system is rotten and work to reform it. Also those who are privileged within the family frequently see nothing to gain by admitting wrongdoing and so don’t. It is as it is with any sort of privilege at the societal level. Those who have it tend not to see it and then resist giving it up even when the weight of evidence that harm is being done is large.
There is a post on lesswrong which compiles the accusations made by the sister. Having worked with many incest victims, family scapegoats and Cinderellas I’ll say the story is familiar to what I’ve heard before and therefore credible.
Sure, if they can build a data set of well tagged emotional content they’ll be able to train their machine to detect and distinguish the emotion in subsequent human samples, but that is not the same thing as a feeling machine.
Endeavour is really good