What’s wrong with killing KOSA?
What’s wrong with killing KOSA?
That is quite a complex task. Being able to focus the beam in a certain direction is one thing. And it is the easier part.
But where should it focus to? You cannot just base the up/down position of the head and therefore the lamp as such, you also need to know where the wearer is looking left or right of the direction of travel. Just imagine you are sitting in a car and a guy with such a headlamp is coming in your direction. All this biker needs to do is just turn his head and look at you for some reason, and blam! You are staring right into a blazing array of LEDs.
No, they do 100km/h. That’s the problem.
Any car going 95m/h on a German Autobahn is going to cause a lot of problems. It would be a moving accident waiting to happen.
He was not alone in his sleep. Volkswagen and Mercedes have been sleeping about as deep and long.
Don’t people use ad blockers? If not, learn how to use one instead to complain.
Sometimes, project requirements are shitty from the start. This one definitely is.
Someone didn’t read the article. She addresses exactly this.
I read the article. It still is the better solution.
?
There actually is an easier solution for this kind of problem: Nail clippers.
Good. This is digital Darwinism at its finest. Weeds out the companies who thought they could save money by relying on a digital monkey instead of actual professionals.
Once you run something on windows, elevation is just a thing of using the right toolbox.
Ah, the good old VMS. Did quite some coding on a VAX11/780. Very nice and round OS. NT was basically a VMS clone for Intel. Although I think there was an implementation for the Alpha, too.
No. 1 upgrade for future Ford cars: A switch to cut off the microphone.
Name and shame that crappy backwards university.
So they noticed that it is time to get out of the bog before they start to stink?
Or make is exactly the size on the picture, where the mammoth fits in a petri dish.
That’s why you have methods of writing like 10x.
They will be called “variables” in the future, and scientists will try to figure out how they tick. And: They were seen as constants for a sufficientyl long time, so still treating them like constants won’t hurt, as the value will probably only vary over long reaches of time or unlikely/uncommon circumstances like relativistic speeds.
We treat g = 9.81m/s², well knowing that this changes depending on height and location. But this value is totally sufficient for everyday purposes, and no bridge will ever collapse just because of local derivations from 9.81. The precise local value of g is only of relevance for a very small range of applications.
Oh, he cannot afford SEO or placing paid ads anymore? Is he fianlly broke by all thoe costs for lawyers and lawsuits?