deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Not all but most, yes. But TBF, sites that still function with JS disabled tend to have the least intrusive telemetry, and might pre-date big data altogether.
Regardless, unless the extent of a page’s analytics is a “you are the #th visitor” counter, all countermeasures must remain active.
Same (AdGuard) I meant like I’d consistently get all of the first page of results linking to hyper SEO clickbait sites / AMP links / Adsense affiliates (think multi-page/gallery/click-through articles and low quality content farm sites like CNET, Forbes, Quora, etc) with a smattering of straight up keyword banks, snippet aggregator spam, and chatbot articles full of longwinded made-up nonsense with zero payoff.
Even more annoying was that Google started dumbing down all my searches, regardless of technical detail and specificity, just railroading me into simplistic drivel. Eventually verbatim/quotes syntax stopped working also, and that was the end of google’s usefulness to me.
Did they fix it? Last I tried it, all I could get was sponsored content and LLM spam.
deleted by creator
Cornucopia (Latin: “horn of abundance”) is an old symbol of plenty.
But yes, I imagine this shot was chosen for its suggestive framing to congratulate the hackers for bullying the bullies.
Concur. Most FERPA violations are similarly mundane snafus.
Droney McTinFoil von Transformer Optimus prime’s HS nickname
deleted by creator
Three sheets to the wind
I’m curious about this. If demonstrable, it seems many Canadians could sue.
What is the typical user workflow? For example:
Edit: looked into this a bit. Did you receive an error message like the following?
This document does not allow you to save any changes you have made to it unless you are using Adobe Acrobat Standard DC or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC
(Regardless it’s totally shitty that government websites recommend a specific company’s software, especially Adobe. I’m just trying to figure out if they actually force citizens to pay a private company.)
Estate tax reform and/or UBI
deleted by creator
Is it unwarranted? Have Chinese tech companies turned a new leaf in their collective InfoSec practices?
Conversely, has Intel had a history of consumer privacy violations?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yes, they were BSing. They’re sold with only a basic collection of 1st-party apps. To get one with 3rd-party bloatware requires special provisioning meant for employee work phones, but it’s uncommon to find in the wild.