Have you read the article? If yes which aspects so you disagree with?
Edit: I don’t want to change the original, but I didn’t mean “did you read the article” as smart assert but as “is that a taste statement or something in relation to what they wrote?”
I would love to find anything that had a more positive outlook … but alas perhaps I should ask OpenGrok because my creativity is not enough.
Fuck em.
Just playing uhm angels advocate? Not sure how to call it, the naive optimist perhaps!
Not necessarily: the statement (in isolation) is a call to learn and become capable to explain limitations. The criticized effect is basically “people not being able to explain the limits”.
I suspect that “finding limits” wasn’t incentived though (and I mean things like positive feedback, not money). And then you get shit-in-shit-out factories.
Or to rephrase your statement: If you want to play a game then stick to the rules you’ve set up - otherwise everyone’s allowed to cheat.
Oh SpaceX core business including their numbers are amazing, I agree! But they also disclosed the whole AI stuff, including the madness of “inference in space” - the physics is then only one search away. … PayPal was really cool and solved problems as well - and so did Tesla!
I think Musk is like a reverse Midas, eversthing he touches becomes shit for everyone else :/
SpaceX was by far the biggest exciting development in the last years for me … There’s still hope I’ll be wrong though - hoping for it!
Its result was and is aggregated by some freaks here
Their own numbers are documented here:
https://ir.spacex.com/investors/default.aspx
Including all their bullshit Musk-AI spendings. I have no idea why anyone thought this to be a good investment or a good company - they did do that audit and published the results, people still flocked (…) to it
In short: yes. You can tune these values when self hosting - it basically changes the b chance which tokens will be used under which circumstances.
The issue is the whole UX behind it. I have yet to see someone review the 30th prompt of “grep” - there is no same default or middle ground.
For example whitelist read actions or harness side limitations to the project folder.
This is just lazy - again. “Users don’t use or very bad security feature so they just want us to disable it”.
I’m so loving it although I’m still having to correct me on even the easiest shit (few hours ago l: invocation with an env var set tona path - “oh right spaces, oh right, path must be in quotes”.
Still love it, just annoyed by my habit brain
To get to the certificate with which you THEN can attack devices remotely. I.e. the attacker needs one device. And the skill to extract the certificate and the willingness to abuse it.
One of each and then the 613k devices in the tested region are exposed.
If there are any plans I don’t know but what I can tell you is that there’s currently no way to circumvent these “restrictions” - because there are none.
Although from a user perspective it feels like something got taken away from Wayland perspective it’s the other way arou d: screensavers want rights that Wayland simply doesn’t provide to any user space application.
A screensaver needs to track user interaction globally (for the timeout), overlay over existing apps, manipulate viewport properties, manage the session and similar things, depending on the details.
Depending on what you want there might be ways to hack something together though.
Then there’s of course the disclaimer that although I’m not ab LLM my training data (aka experience) might be out of date :D
This sounds like an ad.
Note that “patented” doesn’t mean shit.
Plus it’s not as unique as they make out to be:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography
I personally wouldn’t use an encryption where someone else could change the conditions on how I use it anyway.
Running both … Nixpkgs will rightfully laugh about this - in about a month once they caught up on recent events.
Loving both arch and nixos though!
So much comments on just the title … Could come from anthropic directly.
There is literally zero basis on the made claim in the article, just arbitrage calculations over supposed token consumptions under non stable test sets.
I have no idea if/how much these stupid fuckers spend to get more customers - and this “article” wasted a lot of time showing that they don’t know either.
(Stupid is cut out because I don’t think they they’re stupid. Which makes it way worse in my book)
Bambu was the one company I oped to be wrong about when first seeing them. But their communication smelled “we are your future” from the beginning. :(
What a shit “but both sides” article.
“Bambu said they didn’t do something wrong so we must take that into consideration”.
It’s one of the most transparent and plump “I want to hold my users hostage” in a long time.
Or is the quintessential immutability.
Yes.
It’s also a completely different way to handle … everything.
Do not think about nixos if you want to know what to try for gaming.
Do look at it id you want to learn the ins and outs of … Well, to be honest nixos. But I’ve learned a lot about standard paths that everyone expects to be there and hell’s loose if they aren’t.
Python runs amok if it can’t write into it’s beloved lib folders, nginx is utterly confused why it can’t generate certificates on startup (read only folders), deployment dependencies are absolutely visible - and if you fick up the whole system just goes “nah, take a step back and think about what you just did”.
I’m now pushing two years on my server and I’m still not sure if I’d recommend it - but I for sure enjoy it!
Same: but it DOES make a difference that’s why I answered it. Target group is not necessarily the poster but other readers - this foundation is cumbersome but awesome, I want to spread positivity where possible :)
Yes because a) they are the biggest authority on these licences in the world, b) have many lawyers at hand actually and c) are the ones who can significantly damage your brand.
Imagine someone with a lot of friends, lawyers and money telling you “be careful, pal”.
Thanks for the explanation! Makes sense to me - although I do understand their marketing and pronociation concerns.
I’m not sure where I stand myself so your point of view is very appreciated :)