I haven’t met a foreigner confusing these type of stuff. Met lots of Americans that do though.
Because Kodi client runs on a different machine?
The webdav server is on a pretty old device so I can’t host Jellyfin or Plex on it as it can’t handle decoding. The other two programs mentioned can index the library perfectly. They both identify TV series, break up the episodes into seasons, get metadata down to individual episodes and I don’t need to do anything manually.
Not really, as those aren’t available on Linux directly. The ‘how to make kodi work’ bit is because my research didn’t give me any apps that can do this by default so I thought kodi might have extensions or forks I missed.
Well, that’s why I’m asking for alternatives but I also know a few people who rip a ton of blurays and throw them to a server and never curate it, and those are the only people self-hosting their media that I know anyway.
It’s not a mess on properly implemented clients but I also have a fraction of the media you have. I put new stuff in, they get indexed, I watch them, I delete them. I am not going to do extra work for the privilege of using Kodi 🤷
your problem is conflating the curation of your library with the applications that will use it.
This is not some extremely hard job that’s way out of the scope of a media center. As I said, other platforms already have applications that can do this without breaking a sweat. I’ve never had to manually organize my files in years in any other platform.
I’ve decided to use Docker
My user is, yes. But there has to be an exploit in sudo for the program to elevate itself using it without the user knowing, no? It’s possible for sure but I’m seeing this type of a precaution on a torrent client for the first time.
Has there ever been such an exploit? Given all other torrent clients I’ve seen just run as your user by default, is there something different in transmission over others that make it more vulnerable?
Isn’t that a risk for anything downloaded, assuming I run transmission as my user, not root?
Did UMU get a launcher? Isn’t a Proton “distribution” any launcher can use?
Isn’t that the globbing operator?
I’m asking global override vs application manifest (not application override). So the app asks for access to home/some-dir
but I have a global override that blocks access to home entirely.
So I need to go look at what filesystem each app is requesting and manually disable that on top of disabling home access entirely? What’s the point of being able to do filesystem=!home
in the global config?
I mean, assuming you’re telling the truth about there being a competent group seriously attempting this, it’s still “trust us bro” to conclusively claim it can’t be achieved without providing a shred of evidence. This makes your original comment irrelevant and worthless.
No, it was AMD knowingly reporting performance from the hidden admin user that noone is supposed to use.