Are they friends? If they are friends sure, they’re evil. Although if that were the case I think the person calling them evil (and the linked blog) would have included that front and center rather than the definition of open source stuff.
I’ve clicked through the links and the most ‘evil’ thing they did seems to be using a non-mainstream open source licence? Evil is getting contracted by Israel. Prohibiting other companies from profiting off your work isn’t evil.
Edit: And they hosted an interview with Curtis Yarvin. That’s bad, but still doesn’t warrant calling them evil.
I’m convinced Arch with archinstall is the easiest Linux to use for users competent with computers. It just requires that the user isn’t afraid of command line interfaces.
I’ve tried the Mint, Ubuntu and uBlue. Had something go wrong with each. Mint didn’t install graphics drivers, Ubuntu had nonsensical design with snap and uBlue corrupted the boot order after a month.
With distros designed to just work it isn’t easy to fix issues when they come up. With Arch there’s no expectation that things work by default, so when something goes wrong you can just make it work again.
I don’t follow your thought process. I didn’t say every running process could kill the lock screen or if it can kill the lock screen it can access everything else, I said any process that kills the lock screen has to be running. And as the attacker with physical access doesn’t know the password they can’t run anything to kill the lock screen. The only way for them to unlock it is if they already have malware on the device, in which case their physical access isn’t the cause of the problem.
How so? The lock screen is to prevent physical access while you’re away, and an attacker can’t kill it without having access in the first place. Any process that can kill it would already have access to your session.
Them who? What happened?
… Brazil is one of the first countries this’ll go into effect and I also remember something about how that first batch of countries was chosen because their governmemts support this change.
Why are distros and packaging formats relevant? I don’t contest that they are, but isn’t that what the steam runtime is supposed to standardize? I’m honestly baffled by the number of native steam builds that are broken in some way on my machine despite using their preferred steam runtime.
How does it even get into emergency mode without the efi partition?
It does claim to be ‘much faster’ than even OBS’ new no copy recording mode so there must be something more
Is there a technical explanation of this? The git page just says that it’s much faster without explaining how
Elisa would be close to ideal if it didn’t assume music always belong to an album
Pretty sure both have been available through portals for at least a year
On one hand I still believe what I said above and what you just said to be true… You can’t mess up Arch in a way you can’t recover. On the other hand I wish I didn’t dread updating my system because every time I update some random program manages to break.