LibertyLizard

Sure if you have the infrastructure and topography to do so. But this adds to the cost.

The problem is everyone always compares solar alone to nuclear in this comparison it looks really good. However when you include the cost of storage, it doesn’t look as good.

The analyses I’ve seen suggest that we will need to build at least some nuclear to achieve the fastest and cheapest decarbonization.

It’s almost like there’s almost zero non-citizens voting or something…

Not that there’s even a need to prevent them from voting.