“Your story does nothing to convince me that the industry is regulated to “strangle” it. You don’t say what the pipe did”

The point of that story is to illustrate the gross inefficiency and bureaucracy of engineering design changes in the nuclear regulatory cycle. What the pipe did doesn’t matter as much as how regulators chose to approach the problem. They effectively wasted months of manpower and materials for nothing.

That to me is strangulation of an industry. Another is how the Obama administration handled Yucca mountain and how the federal government, by law, owns all the uranium and is thus legally responsible for its disposal.

No real movement has been made on this front by the NRC and is the main cause of why we have all our spent fuel sitting on concrete outside of the plant instead of a long term geological repository.

It came out of the ground, so just dig under the water table into the bed rock and leave it there.

“Completely different scale of responsibility”

And completely different scale of power generation. Nuclear plants are far more power dense, and that is the ultimate factor in “potential danger”. Solar is great for places that we have already developed but are underutilized, like roof tops or farms, but they aren’t going to power an arc furnace or a manufacturing facility or a data center. The power simply isn’t there vs. The land cost that would be required for it would be astronomical.

Nuclear and " renewables " are two different tools for the same toolbox. One shouldn’t be excluded over the other because both are extremely beneficial. The “green” infighting only serves the fossil fuel lobby.

I didn’t realize we put a dollar price on fixing the climate.

That’s a bad faith argument. As someone who spent years in the nuclear industry, a lot of the regulation exists to strangle the industry.

An example was at Vogtle in Georgia, where a section of pipe was determined by the NRC inspectors to be too small and ordered it redesigned.

When that happens, that’s where huge delays come in. The design has to go back to home office and be redesigned and bench tested. While that happens, worm is stalled on that section of the plant. That costs money because all the workers still need to be paid.

They redesigned the pipe and installed it just for the NRC to go back and say that the original pipe was correct and to put it back.

The cost of nuclear also comes from the way we manage energy utilities. When a solar farm is built, the builders can just sell it to the utility and walk away, no consideration for decommissioning or waste disposal or environmental considerations.

A nuclear plant requires a whole plan and money on how it will be decommissioned by the builders themselves. Nuclear is the only power type held to this standard.

Nuclear power is a good thing, and its time the greens and people left of center get on board. Its scientifically sound and immensely powerful with no greenhouse gasses released.

You are correct, technically Prohibition worked, but its one of those “at what cost” scenarios. The absolute explosion in organized crime that came with it along with the associated cost of enforcement for fighting alcohol consumption makes the argument for a different approach.

I won’t downvote you because what you said is true, its just that the negative association of the explosion of crime and government overreach into peoples’ lives gives people a kneejerk reaction to the statement.

People often don’t think of WHY the prohibition movement was so popular that it could get an amendment passed, but alcoholism at that time was so much more severe than we can even fathom today. Their approach was wrong, but they had legitimate grievance.

“For all the hardest projects”

The funny part of all of this is that EVs don’t exist to save the environment, they exist to save car companies. Between the falling birth rates and the necessity to fix the car based infrastructure of cities, this “EV revolution” is a flash in the pan.

The amount of money and infrastructure that China dedicated to POVs will soon be an anchor around their neck as they come to reckon with the fallout of the “One Child” policy. They saw the US model as the method to reach global dominance, and went all in on a model that had alreasy reached the end of its relevance.

They really do just worship rich people don’t they, and not even the person themselves, just the fact that they are wealthy. Imagine making another person into your identity this much. Not even Trump, just anyone. Then take this orange waste of resources with no redeeming qualities whatsoever and making him out to be the gravitational center of your universe.

If anything has been a driver of human ingenuity, it’s the horny

I would recommend being familiar with config files and comfortable with the command line and bash. It’s a very powerful being able to rebuild your OS at will. I would also look into Bazzite if you are interested in immutable distros.

I recommend firing up a virtual pc first with the distro first to get a feel for it.

I think the Dutch are doing it as well. I’m all for it, when I switched my laptop over from Windows 11 to NixOS, it stopped running at like a 100 degrees while doing nothing more than streaming video and light compiling.

I mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.

P.A. Luty’s expedient homemade firearms

Electric cars are a not the future. Public transit is.

Electric cars exist to bail out the automotive industry. They will become the albatross around Chinas neck as their population ages out of consumption.

All true. It would be easiest to lay in heart of the city where it is most dense to attract more customers per square mile.

Ideally, the utilities are made public and regulated by the public, but nationalizing or bringing it under state control is an even harder political sell.

I’ll have to spread the word one way or another, which will be tough when so much is happening these days.

If it could be done, it would be in Seattle, given that the city owns its Utilities already.

I’m in Washington State, but I’m not a native of WA. I imagine they would be at least receptive to the idea.

Edit: WA does allow towns and municipalities to provide their own utilities.

Thanks

Yeah, I’ve been saying for years that anything that isn’t us sleeping, fucking, or running after our food is just made up by people.

The system can and does change, we just need it to change for the better of the majority, and in a day and age where we are as connected together as we are, we have the capability to actually utilize the advantage we have in numbers.

Laying fiber lines can be done by the city. Building server farms can be done at the city level. The municipality, depending on size, would have the resources to make a MAN. I understand that the most difficult aspect of implementing it is politics.

I ask because I am tired of corporate pig shit finding more and more insane ways of extracting money from every single minutia of our lives. Especially with services like utilities that have a monopoly because of the physical nature of the infrastructure.

We will have claw back our rights one at a time.

I think we are getting to a point in the US where people are just going to start ignoring the government. People don’t subscribe to institutions with no credibility and don’t provide value in return.

Linux: Pain will be your teacher.