they wrote ass backwards ass backwards. It’s a joke, not self censorship.

This headline… do I smell toast?

“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”

Everyone’s happy

oh yeah, just giving in to opression is easier than fighting it, ain’t it?

I am squarely on the reddit should lose this side.

Anthropic may be breaking copyright, but not Reddit’s copyright. Sure maybe Anthropic should be sued, but not by Reddit.

Shit in My Hands?

come to the dork side

For search I’m really happy with Kagi

I am optimistic about self driving, just not Teslas. Unlike other self driving cars, Tesla is exlusively reliant on cameras. Others, like Waymo, have cameras, lidarr sensors and radar.

A usb stick with a live linux iso is generally enough

You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim

Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music

deleted by creator

sure, wirelessly.

I liked gnome for its minimalistic UI. I then realized i3 does that better :D

it would, but the act of giving a dollar doesn’t double as a way to validate transactions

Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.

It doesn’t matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn’t actually capable of following that instruction.

I assume they’re talking about the design and training, not the prompt.