Well I tried to show you what’s happening, I’m sorry you’re not seeing it, but I’m done. Have a nice day.
Well I tried to show you what’s happening, I’m sorry you’re not seeing it, but I’m done. Have a nice day.
Maybe you’re missing the connection here.
Facebook is implementing features to prevent some types of advertising, as per the article.
Facebook allows the purchase of the exact same advertising, so long as you pay their fee.
It’s just a different flavour of the same shit.
These days I have to create a spam filter for my phone notifications, let alone emails.
WhatsApp is owned by Facebook and you can pay them for corporate accounts and advertising.
How dare they advertise without giving WhatsApp (aka Facebook) a cut of the profits!
I always give “companyname@personaldomain.com”
That way datasets are harder to correlate and I know who leaked 😝
You don’t get to being the CEO of a large company without being an asshole of one type or another, and outrage drives views and clicks.
Soooo…. You get what you incentivise.
I didn’t say great, just “has more than one redeeming quality”
I’m very aware of the Facebook shit list, that’s why I’m so shocked.
As a user, and great fan of the llama models….
I did not have “Zuckerberg saves us from ai” on my bingo card.
…… nor did I have “musk threatens and then pussies out from fighting Zuckerberg”
Or even “Zuckerberg becomes less despised as an individual”
Like…… have I switched timelines and universes?
Search engines are rapidly becoming a thing of the past.
Google decided a few years ago that quality doesn’t matter (and they’re right, the monopoly they have means that their quality doesn’t matter for a good long while) but over the long term that’s sitting themselves in the foot.
This is just phase 2, installing fences around your market.
Phase 2 is often legal, so I’m waiting for some patent battles or something like that too, but the effect is the same.
Fair, charged is the wrong word.
But please explain how you see the fiduciary duty then?
A CEOs job is literally to serve the financial interests of the shareholders.
In fact a CEO can be fired or charged for not doing it.
How is that not legally compelling a company to make the most money possible, when to have their top employee by the balls like that?
And jokes about meatball Ron
https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/help/articles/201658943-Export-your-workspace-data
It absolutely is.
Slack must have this for compliance issues, or they would be locked out of many industries (like banking and insurance)
This took me a minute to figure out 😝
That’s just it…… they are building it out properly, their goal is just not what you think it is.
The problem is the same as with the telephone answering trees.
If they’re used to help you get where you’re going, then they’re great. But that’s not the best financially motivated decision. Solving your problem costs the companies money. Pissing you off and convincing you that your problem shouldn’t be fixed saves money on support.
So making you go round in circles is the machine doing EXACTLY what they want it to do.
Not just for 2 years, XP removed it in sp2.
And even when it supported it, many versions wouldn’t let you use it, or would let you “see” it but not use it.
For basically the life of XP.
I’m the one getting snippy? Hahaha okay.
I read the article, I’m just commenting about the world around the article from a small step back, and I tried to help you see that.
Have a nice day.