MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 6 months agoSince Xorg is getting old, looking at trying Wayland WMslemmy.worldimagemessage-square239linkfedilinkarrow-up1565arrow-down123
arrow-up1542arrow-down1imageSince Xorg is getting old, looking at trying Wayland WMslemmy.worldMidsizedSedan@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square239linkfedilink
minus-squareAItoothbrush@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down12·6 months agoLook at their comments. Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. Classical centrist arguments and im gonna die on this hill.
minus-squareKalcifer@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days ago […] Classical centrist arguments […] How are you defining centrism?
minus-squareKalcifer@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days ago […] Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. […] Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?
minus-squareel_bhm@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months agoHow is knowing a context a centrist argument? People want to understand.
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoHaving to support your argument with facts and reasoning is a well known leftist plot to undermine my feeling-based reality.
minus-squarethreshold_dweller@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·6 months agoHuh. Look at that, another toxic user to block.
Look at their comments. Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. Classical centrist arguments and im gonna die on this hill.
How are you defining centrism?
Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?
How is knowing a context a centrist argument? People want to understand.
Having to support your argument with facts and reasoning is a well known leftist plot to undermine my feeling-based reality.
Huh. Look at that, another toxic user to block.