• Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The propaganda of “Chinese vehicles are cheap and dangerous” only works when people don’t have the product in front of them.

    Plus they’d have to pass whatever requirements in the US to be sold, the same ones that the ‘domestic’ manufacturers do.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is this even a concern anymore? Haven’t we pretty much gutted any requirements that would actually matter / wouldn’t already exist in Chinese cars?

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        There are some American safety requirements that are based on protecting the safety of the driver at the expense of everything else that cheaper vehicles might not meet.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            One example is a strong A-Pillar on a car–the metal post to the left and right of the windshield. Most manufacturers meet the standard by making it really beefy and wide. It protects the driver from collision but makes collision more likely by obstructing the driver’s vision.

            Car safety standards in the US are actively hostile to anyone outside a car.