• GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can’t really monetize PeerTube though, so you’re never going to get full time creators there. Media distribution has always been a choke point. Always will be. Short of a non-profit foundation and a unionized creators guild joining forces to operate a decentralized subscription video platform, you’re never going to have a real alternative. I mean… there’s Nebula which is basically that, but who goes to Nebula, it’s full of lefties and educators and theatre people.

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They could still get sponsors and have “ads” during the stream. Though most already do that in addition to YouTube monetization.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but then you’re still bringing a for-profit company into the mix. PeerTube is your loss-leader and Patreon is your main platform.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can monetize PT with Patreon, but you can monetize YT with Patreon and get paid twice.

        That’s why YT has 5 9’s of the creators.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m with GreenBeard on this and was always saying that monetization is the biggest peertube problem. Patreon and such are not an ideal option, subscription is IMO. A subscription that would be distributed through authors fairly, but that’s not an easy task I suppose.