EDIT: For some context, I recently gave podman another go. I have a few services on my homelab server set up in docker containers, so I tried migrating to podman.

After the second major bug (open issue on github) I encountered looked like it would require completely dropping using compose files to work around, I gave up and went back to docker.

I like the idea of podman, but it’s just not stable. I’ll try again in a year or so.

As a bonus, docker’s CLI is significantly nicer.

  • Lena@gregtech.eu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And, in part yes, but these restrictions also apply to docker-cli and moby, although to a lesser extent

    What restrictions? The ones on all US software or something else?

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As is evident just from the link at the bottom of the notice, it’s about US export controls on cryptographic software, which is a source of contention since the nineties.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not about personal or commercial use, it’s about whether the government allows exporting cryptographic software. Which it mostly does, but didn’t always, and still has some conditions.

      • Lena@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Apache License 2.0 does allow commercial use, and basically any other use. Can you say specifically where those restrictions are stated?