Other open source software gets similar treatment, with Colorado going as far as explicitly excluding code repositories and container platforms.

  • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Not exactly. They can always take this one step further and make it more difficult to use anything but closed OSs for fundamental applications, like banking. It could come via an ID requirement where authentication goes through some complicated process with proprietary hardware and drivers. That could also come in phases, such as mandating all desktop/laptop distributors require it prior to distribution. Then the tech giants can market it like, “never require a password again, if you have…” effectively marketing back the convenience they helped take. Sooner or later, it’s a piece of shit system that banks and jobs rely on, everybody ends up accepting it while complaining that it makes a terrible password for obvious reasons (ref: your Social Security card).

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      These laws should hopefully be struck down as unconstitutional because of their invasion of privacy(a violation of the 3rd and 4th amendments) and a general violation of the first amendment.