• bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m late and this will get buried, but this really speaks to the difference between the open source / ESR / OSI ideology and the free software / RMS / GNU ideology.

    Open source ideology says it is better because it produces better software. If MacOS X was closed source and better it serves as a repudiation of that ideology.

    Free software ideology says it is better because denying users any of the four freedoms is an immoral act. If MacOS X was proprietary software and better, it would still be immoral to deny users their freedoms; the ideology is not impacted.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well, you see, I deserve free software for my hobbies, or even my business. You deserve to suck shit and die in a gutter. /s

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think it’s because somebody has to produce that media, and the one producing it gets to choose the license for it, and that license can make it free or non-free.

        Now, for open source software, somehow, a lot of people came together and built software that was free. While for movies, shows, books, whatever, the same thing didn’t happen, or at least not to the same extent.

        I’m all for FOSS gaming btw.