• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Those are also entirely optional and not having them filled in doesn’t cause other software to stop doing what the user wants.

      • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not true. Because the stated purpose of the laws at play is to enable that to be queried so that sites can decide what is appropriate for you to see.

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          That is the purpose, but the field is implemented as optional and modifiable with admin privileges.

                  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    No. It shouldn’t be part of the OS at all. It should be a third party package that one can choose to then add the repo or download the package, and manually install. And then click that you agree you want age tracking before it actually installs. It’s should be very manual and opt in only, and never installed by default. That way those that wish to can have it, and no one else need comply in advance to fascism. Opt out is an awful plan. You know that. You’re just trolling or are for a deeper police state.

      • Grazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        … unless someone merges a PR making it required, which is the discussion of this thread.

        • ruan@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          What if someone makes a PR making your real name and address being required? Damn…

          • Grazed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            So you’re arguing that systemd shouldn’t have reverted that pointless PR because it’s not actually enforced? Sorry, I’m probably not understanding your comment

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            You’re right.

            “What if <insert dystopian scenario that hasn’t happened>?” is a silly argument.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And then you can input a random date from before 1940 and forget about it…