• Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And only the fucking rich can afford it. You forgot that part in the title.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, we can make fusion happen, but it’s not exactly useful outside of turning things into not things anymore.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not just cold fusion. We are still working on creating hot fusion reactions that are controlled. That honestly makes sense. It’s kinda weird that we were able to theorize the uncontrolled reaction of fission, and then used that to create a mostly kinda stable controlled fission reactor.

  • radiouser@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Swear articles like this get pushed every few years. Let me know when it’s a reality I can get at my local dentist.

    • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the same study that’s been in process for about a decade. It entered human trials last year with those trials expected to take 5 years. Growing teeth is slow. It’s not really being pushed, it’s just the same reliable hit for various news sites to break out on slow news days.

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Popular mechanics is a terrible source. They post click bait trash like this on a consistent basis.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    No they won’t.

    This is the same as “humans may live on a mara colony in 10 years!”

    No they won’t, not even close.

    This article is bullshit and so is the entire site, it’s all djinn economy, all wishes and fantasy with a clickbait header to make sure you go there to watch the ads to make them money.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Been hearing this claim for 20 years. Let me know where and when I can sign up for the trails.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    […] will administer the treatment to patients between the ages of 2 to 7 who are missing at least four teeth

    Yeah, even if this is approved in some form… growing new teeth for young children is not the same as for adults. Very weird this is the population they’re testing on. I’d think they would be testing on people with 10+ missing teeth in their 40s, 50s, 60s+

    […]these treatments are currently focused on patients with congenital tooth deficiency

    Again, not for us.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 days ago

      You skipped right past the paragraph before that one describing the adult study that needs to succeed prior to the start of the child study.

      Now, scientists will see just how similar, because humans are undergoing a similar trial. Lasting 11 months, this study focuses on 30 males between the ages of 30 and 64—each missing at least one tooth. The drug will be administered intravenously to prove its effectiveness and safety, and luckily, no side effects have been reported in previous animal studies.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    i keep seein this story with zero details on application efficacy… and now i see a thing where theyre giving the drug intravenously??

    how do they know it will grow a tooth in a human being and how does it target a lost tooth if not administered directly?

    • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve seen one of these talked about before, and the mechanism seemed to be in that one that there’s a gene in our DNA that triggers us to grow new teeth (that’s how we replace our baby teeth with adult teeth), but that that gene turns off after we grow in our set of adult teeth. It’s apparently the same gene that allows sharks to grow new teeth. What the drug does is it turns that gene back on, allowing us to grow new teeth to replace lost ones.

      This might not be the same study though, as I’ve also seen one previously years ago that was about a drug that turned on a gene in our teeth to allow them to repair the enamel in them and fill in cavities by putting biodegradable gauze soaked in the drug inside a cavity and letting the tooth do the rest.