• Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Trains are easy and they’re easily electrified already. So putting solar on the trains won’t have any advantage.

      Rails are the difficult part of railways. They never seem to put them between my house and my work. They’ve put something called a road in between instead.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I presume they meant to put in railway infrastructure.

        Railways cost so much less than one highway, we could have a system basically from home to work.
        (eg smol trams to a midway se station to high-speed trains)

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            You mean the huge underground train station & several miles of tunnels around if, with all the work preformed underneath an undisturbed city?

            Yes, that is still waaay cheaper than constructing an underground highway of that magnitude/that area (+ an underground station you conveniently included in the estimate) .

            Or did you have something else in mind?

              • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                Same reasons as railway I suppose - its expensive to destroy a city centre to get the land needed for it.

                But you started the comparison with the underground thing.