• Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I remember XP and Seven as solid OSes where everything just worked.

    Now it’s a mix of crap, hey this app is in night mode, this one isn’t! Want to change a parameter? Ha ha you can’t! You want to share a folder? Good luck!

    And it’s heuristics/analysis just because Windows is inherently insecure drags any pc down to a crawl…

    And publicity??!

    Aurgh

    Edit: can I run my old CS3 Photoshop in wine or something? And 3dstudio without crazy lags? If so I’ll stop using windows completely.

    • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Windows 7 was peak Windows. They smoothed out all the problems of Vista (plus hardware caught up to the recommended specs) and all the new tech that Vista introduced matured a bit. Was one of the nicest looking operating systems they ever released too - though that is highly subjective.

      Everything after has introduced some form of garbage in it’s iteration. Windows 8 had a garbage tablet interface that sucked when used with keyboard/mouse. Like the majority of devices that it was installed on. Windows 10 rolled back some of those shit changes but was the version Microsoft started implementing their adware. Windows 11 took it to 11 and put in a bunch of hardware requirements that conveniently required you to dump some money into Intel hardware.

      Been running Linux for last six months and it is crazy how much better it runs. It isn’t as cumbersome to use as the old days… But every once in a while I run into something that requires Googling and tweaking in Terminal. It’s been my best experience with the OS though going back to WAY back (Mandrake and Slackware days - or are they still around? Early 2000’s maybe???)

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why cs3 when krita would have more features and be free? Familiarity?

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because I’m used to it I guess, and I haven’t found a single app that handles pixels and transparency well.

        Like zoom in like crazy, update 1 pixel, save, transparency is still there.

        Haven’t looked for a bunch of years though, maybe it’s time to try again :-)

        • rem26_art@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Krita’s always done transparency just fine for me. It’s pretty good these days. There’s also a built in option to set your keyboard shortcuts to the same ones that Photoshop uses.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I try never to underestimate the value of sheer familiarity. New software is like breaking in a new pair of leather shoes, sometimes you have to bleed a little before your feet adapt and you adjust it to fit.

    • traveler@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the CPUs riddled with security flaws that suddenly get discovered, fixed and you lose 20% of performance overnight.