A nice explanation of what’s wrong with web-based AI. I hope other content providers follow suit.

I did this same move two years ago. Make a list of critical must have functions. Get a second storage drive like your current one, swap out the old and install Kubuntu. Get those critical apps installed and tested. Create a virtual machine out of your old primary drive. Boot that inside Linux when needed.

This is exactly what I did. Later I copied my old system to a VM and I boot it up inside Linux when needed.

Search is to Google as F150 is to Ford…anything that threatens it makes the whole thing crumble.

How can i take an article that uses the word “anywho” seriously?

I think when you’ve gone ad homonym then I won

No, the camera data is combined into one visual “truth” I would bet. There was a fatal accident where the radar didn’t see a truck because it shot under it. At the time the radar was more trusted than the camera. The only way to solve that was to only have one sensor, and radar could never be the sole input.

Why does no one mention why they said they dropped RADAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with RADAR? There were constant problems on this point. LIDAR is another redundant and possibly conflicting input.

Only 4 near misses on the demo video!

If their best angle is to recycle a 20 year old brand …well I can’t imagine that will go very far

It’ll be less than a decade

AI already has to deal with hallucinations, throw in government censorship too and I think it becomes even less of a serious, useful tool.

Sorry but I have a yoga running Kubuntu. I can’t make hibernate work and “sleep” will kill my battery in less than 24 hours.

This should kill off NPM