I’m open to more people joining the mod team, my messages are always open, and I mention that in the community sidebar.

Instance admins also actively resolve reports and do monthly update posts where they note abandoned communities that people are welcome to take over. E.g. September post https://lemmy.zip/post/22004722

There were warrants issued on March 25 to him and his brother, which were ignored.

Source: https://www.politico.eu/article/exclusive-telegram-ceo-brother-nikolai-durov-wanted-france-authorities-pavel-durov/

It’s not mentioned, but I think the compatibility layer for 1.19 releases breaks support for older versions. Ask your instance admins to update the backend.

Shameless promo !databreaches@lemmy.zip

So Matrix protocol?

https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor gives a good overview with links to further reads.

It’s the same type of microtransactions that they had in Resident Evil 4 Remake, so it’s probably not so much a test as a limit they found where backlash is small enough that it still makes sense. But there are 2 big differences with Dragon’s Dogma 2.

1. They fucked up the PC port.
2. They increased the base game price.

Anyone that tries to justify microtransactions in a paid game is a moron. They were literally introduced in free to play games to finance the game development. In paid game, it’s just pure greed.

Quad9 if you just want to set it and forget about it.

NextDNS is you don’t mind doing some tinkering.

Still open issue https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539685

The courts haven’t even decided if LLM creations counts as reproductions or unique works under the legal framework.

So, instead of providing all our comments for free to LLMs, how about adding a copyright notice to everything we write?

Per your own example, the LLMs are trained with some possibly copyrighted content, so why would adding a license now matter if it didn’t previously?

There are plenty of solutions to improve the situation or change the direction, reversal is not possible. Neither from technological side nor societal side.

Solution requires a resolution. Unless you have a time machine, that’s not a solution. We can’t go back in time.

Unless the solution was in the Ground News ad section, then they didn’t. All they said in the “Something More Positive” was going back to the internet 20 years ago, which is not a solution…

Some valid points, but then they haven’t offered any solutions and promoted the same platforms who use algorithms that are the cause of the problem by their own research.

Well, then the answer is obvious, no? You can, but there can be some compatibility issues. And changing your operating system is not a criminal offense. As far as Google internal policies, you would have to ask them.

Chromebook’s run on ChromeOS which is Linux based…

It wouldn’t. If Google only owned Chrome, then maybe. But combined with services like AdSense, Google can easily leverage people and site operators to keep using Chrome.

Firefox is losing users year over year. I think it’s beyond saving.

Jitsi

https://killedbygoogle.com

It’s a lot worse at the moment. Doesn’t combine results from multiple sites, doesn’t support Google results and lacks support for any configuration. It’s also manages to not have a button to go home after a search.