SystemD Pilot is a desktop application for managing systemd services on GNU/linux machines. The app is very lightweight and supports common tasks such as starting and stopping systemd services.

It can also show detailed status for each service.

Features: List services

Filter by running state

Start, Stop, Restart, Enable and Disable services + show status for each service

Create override configuration for any unit file using the edit button

Option for reloading systemd manager configuration (systemctl daemon-reload)

Easy search. Just start typing and the app will find relevant services

Lightweight

Available for download as deb, rpm and AppImage

Integration into GNOME desktop (libadwaita)

Made with love for the FOSS community. Please give it a try and share your thoughts.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    oh it’s not an official thing, that could probably use some more clarification as the name makes it sound like something developed by the systemd people

  • Railison@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Fantastic, Linux needs tools like this for users who need to make occasional changes and inspect systemd.

    For inspiration, I would suggest you also look at LaunchControl, which is a GUI tool to administer launchd on macOS.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      There are some. COCKPIT would probably suit most people. OpenSUSE has a GUI Services tool built into YAST

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Nice, thanks! So weird these tools are not commonly used - managing systemd remains one of the common terminal PITAs for everyone who doesn’t appreciate the Great Holy Terminal

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Funny thing is, that there are many things I prefer the terminal for, but systemd deamons are not these things 😂

    • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Aren’t those defunct? I was looking for examples of exactly this a while back and none of them were being actively maintained.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I use Systemd-Manager since a long time now and it worked always well. But it could well be, that it is unmaintained…

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    NO! NO, I WON’T HAVE IT!

    I will not give up my command line, obscure, non-obvious commands that control my machine!

    It is an abomination that I don’t have to search for, and then wade through hundreds of AI generated pages of useless information just to show me what services are running with systemd!

    I am seriously considering starting my own startup system. I am thinking I could initiate (init) runlevels to start subsystems at various stages. If anyone is interested, hit me up.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      Maybe you can script everything, with convoluted interconnections that are impossible to troubleshoot. Now that would be the way to control all the systems behind impenetrable obfuscation and keep those dratted normies from understanding anything.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      wade through hundreds of AI generated pages of useless information

      I personally find the best use of AI is to read those pages of useless information and summarise what I actually want to know.

      Google: " hugo, show total number of posts not including pages " = advertising, a billion pages of partially but not entirely relevant information that takes ages to wade through.

      Gemini: same question: Clear explanation and working examples in seconds.

      They’re both google, but one knows what I’m actually trying to say and doesn’t (yet) push advertising at me.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Oooh this will be perfect for a bunch of stuff I do.

    Can you create new services or do you still need to create the .service file manually?

    What about .timer files?

    • mfat@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve been thinking about a “create new service” feature but I’m not sure about two things: 1.how useful it can be 2.how to implement this to actually make life easier for end users

      Adding a generic template would not be difficult.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I would absolutely use it. In fact creating and editing services would be the primary selling point IMO. It doesn’t need to be much “easier” than doing it in the terminal or file explorer, to me the primary benefit would just be the ease of use of creating, loading, and starting a new service all in one place.

        I think a generic template would be great.

        You could turn the whole thing into a giant GUI settings screen, allowing navigation to an exectuable, after which you could provide some of the most typical options as sliders, number fields, switches, or whatever is suitable. But that would be a large amount of work, and I’m not sure it would simplify things much.

        The starting point should just be a text field, but with a link to the service file docs for help/reference.

        • mfat@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          Brilliant thanks for your feedback and thoughts. Will look into this.

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            As far as i can tell a full gui for systemd service files would be practically impossible. But a template ui would be sick, maybe something like an app autostart template could look like this:

            Program: 
            
            Launch options:
            
            When: early/normal/login/graphical-start
            
            Restart: never/once/always
            

            Just spitballing here though.

            • mfat@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              This was added to the latest version. You can now quickly start a new service from the app.

            • oldfart@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              And the RestartSomethingInterval=0 option so systemd keeps restarting the program like an obedient machine it should be, not give up because it’s tired

      • OADINC@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Even if the new service is “just” a text field for code + the name of the service. If it saves it in the right location for you its useful. Not having to fiddle with that stuff as an end user is nice.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Making life easier for end users means more documentation about what you are doing. I mean that’s the main difference between Commandline and a GUI.

        Oh look Avahi Service, let’s stop it, what does it mean to stop it.

        Creating a new Service, sure but what is needed, are there examples? Formfill lines with a hint what’s needed, maybe some dropdown entries?

        You got what I mean.

      • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Just having something that shows the field options and formats it correctly would be fantastic. Tooltips and all that could be added later to lower the bar of entry for new users.

    • mfat@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve not used arch for years but I’ll look into this.